Home |
Past Issues|
Bob Jobs |
Who's in Charge |
Mailing List |
Bob Gear |
Copyright Notice for Plagiarists

 

Want to write comedy? - Click Here  

 

by Sam Barrett, Craptastic Movie Critic

As is my modus operandi, I usually make crass statements about movies, or expose weaknesses of particular movies that feature shitty actors and pretend like I could do it any better. Most often, I fabricate lies and then try to convince you, the reader, that they’re true. However, after watching “Ray,” the appropriate thing seems to deliver a humble and sincere review, worthy of such a musical legend. It's simply difficult to make fun of a blind guy, let alone a blind guy who accomplished more in his lifetime that I would in ten lifetimes. However, a blind guy who is also a decades-long junkie/womanizer is something else entirely. I'm sure you would agree that's fair territory.

Okay, you've all heard the Oscar chatter about Jamie Foxx. It's true. He's really good. He absolutely channels a blind, womanizing, junkie singer to such a degree that you forget you're watching one of the Wayans brothers -- or whoever that guy is. Anyway, the story and all that just pales in comparison to the acting, which, after reading the press notes, I'm glad they didn't go with Ben Affeck in blackface. Or Roberto Begnini for that matter. And Jerry Bruckheimer at the helm would have fucked this one up too.

As for the rest of the movie, who cares? Jamie Foxx is not only gonna get an Oscar, he's going to get more tail than he knows what to do with. The film itself is nothing new or groundbreaking as far as biopics go, and I should warn you, it's three hours long.

I did learn a lot about Ray Charles. To the average guy, Ray Charles had a very unusual life. When compared to other musicians, he shot up heroin, smoked dope and bang chicks like everyone else. It's just fun to watch a blind guy do all that. The only surprising revelation is that Ray Charles wasn’t always a super nice guy. This actually makes me like him more -- especially since before he died, he guided the whole movie. Now that's honesty.

At the end of the film, pictures of Ray Charles flicked across the screen. It was uncanny how similar Jamie Foxx actually looks like Ray Charles. Which was cool because Lou Diamond Phillips looked a lot like Ritchie Valens in “La Bamba.” But then Jamie Foxx turned in a stellar performance, thus ending comparisons to Lou Diamond Phillips, who sucks. His performance had everything it needs to win an Oscar: depth, complexity and the fact that his character was handicapped.

Most likely, Foxx will join the ranks of the other actors to win Academy Awards for their painfully accurate portrayals of handicapped and/or retarded people. Dustin Hoffman, Daniel Day Lewis, Cliff Robertson, and Cuba Gooding Jr. Actually, Cuba Gooding Jr. only acted like a retard after he accepted the Academy Award. Same difference.

Go see this movie or instead, you can attempt to sit through "Surviving Christmas", where Ben Affleck merely channels the ghost of shitty actors, shitty writers and shitty directors.

And yet, he'll still get a front row seat at the Oscars — right next to Foxx. Hollywood sucks.

 

Jamie Foxx as "Ray".


SEND THIS ARTICLE TO A FRIEND!


Support Our Sponsors!

Cardinals Tix, MLB Playoffs tix, World Series Tix

Retro t-shirts!

Debt Consolidation

 

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST FOR UPDATES  

Copyright © 2001-2006 Bob From Accounting/Orange Planet Entertainment, Inc. - All Rights Reserved. That means you too, Mr. Steven Spielberg